They are soooo going to take my feminist id card away from me....Oh well. It's probably been in the making since I bought a copy of The Dirt.
Ok, so I got pissed off at my American Women Writer's class last night. Really fuckin' pissed. And it wasn't a calling-names, talk-shit-about pissed. It was a good old your-logic-is-so-fucking-wrong intellectual pissed which is a million times more volatile. Anyway...
I have a hard time accepting a feminist critical view at every piece of literature I am confronted with. Moreover, I have a hard time believing that women hold a monopoly over writing talents in this world. And perhaps most importantly, I have an extreme problem with people who think that war/hardship/whatever is all good because it gives us such HOPE. HOPE IS BULLSHIT! THERE IS NO HOPE! I mean, for crying out loud people, there should be no way that you can take an event like the London blitz and try to say that it is a positive occurence because it brings a community together and gives them hope. If you buy this argument, you are playing with a fucking tinder box--if you allow that something good always comes from something bad, you are accepting that there can really be no bad occurences--that it's all good in the hood. And I think we all know, no matter how fucking idealistic you are, that there is bad stuff and it happens and no amount of good can change that. To believe that good always comes from bad makes you pretty naive and pretty stupid. Damn.
But enough on that. Here's an idea: Sometimes when writers are forgotten about and covered by the sands of time as it were, it's for a reason unrelated to their sex. MAYBE THEY WERE BAD WRITERS, guilty of pithy poetry that is as naive as it is incoherent. Sometimes writers who are read and canonized are treated that way because they are talented. Perhaps the reason we all read
The Wasteland is because it is good, not because it was written by a man.
And finally, feminist criticism asks us to develop an opposition stance to anything we read. I don't buy it. Some books and writers are wonderful, no matter what their sexual politics were. I mean, Hemingway probably wouldn't be the kind of guy that I would hang out with, but he's a great writer, and I love his stuff. No woman should have to defend her love of Faulkner to a bunch of crazed radicals who see only his misogyny. And don't EVEN get me started on what these people do to Tolstoy.
Now, don't get me wrong. I still consider myself to be a feminist, albeit a cynical, unorthodox one. But, there is a problem when an ideology colors your readings, your view of history, your whatever. Ideology is dangerous because it asks for total alliegance--no lukewarm here. When you start making broad generalities (like women represent hope and men represent bleakness!), the ideology has gone too far. I firmly believe that no one should align themselves as being totally something or totally something else--we should all take from the giant salad bar of life, choosing what we want here and there and not just eating a shit load of radishes. Do you get what I'm saying? If one is given to feminism all the time, there is no time to taste all the other condiments (or John Milton's) around. A tired metaphor, I know. But I just preach moderation. The other trail--there lies the way to fanaticism, and fanaticism is scary no matter what mask it wears.
I guess that's enough on that. I am technically done with academia until week after next, so this is probably the last coherent argument you'll here from me in a while. Tomorrow I'll be stupid and worthless once again, because as long as there are midgets drunk on TV, I'll be there watching them. And that, my friends, is the stuff of life--not feminism, not colonialism, not anything that ends in a suffix. Just good old pop culture, brought to us by the American dream and godless corporations. And what could be wrong with that?